|
p0565 Advertisements for movies that falsely quoted from a non-existent critic were commercial speech, so an action based on those statements and brought under the Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and Consumer Legal Remedies Act was not subject to the SLAPP statute.CitationREZEC v SONY (Nonexistent Critic) 116 CA4 135 [See: B&PC 17200 etseq; 17500 etseq; CivC 1750 etseq; CCP 425.16; Nagel v Twin Labs 109 CA4 39, T/AT 6/03; Bolger v Youngs 463 US 60; Keimer v Buena Vista Books 75 CA4 1220, T/AT 12/99]
|
|
