|
3879 Under a business policy that excluded liability for damage resulting from the use of an automobile unless it was owned by another and parked on or next to the insured's premises, there was no coverage for a personal injury claim made by a passenger in a vehicle owned by the insured, and the trial court was not required to grant a continuance for further discovery before granting summary judgment for the carrier in a coverage dispute.CitationACE v WALKER (Parking Exception) 121 CA4 1017 [See: Montrose v Superior Court 6 Cal.4th 287, T/AT 1/94; Wausau v Unigard 68 Cal.App.4th 1030, T/AT 2/99; Atlantic Mut v Lamb 100 Cal.App.4th 1017, T/AT 9/02]
|
|
