|
3923 In satisfying the claim presentation requirement of the Government Code, the claim presented need not specify each particular act or omission later proven to have caused the injury, so long as the subsequent lawsuit is not based on an entirely different set of facts; after a claim was filed for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, a complaint that added related but formerly unspecified reasons for the termination did not state additional causes of action and was not precluded by the claim presentation requirement.CitationSTOCKETT v ASSOCIATION OF CA WATER AGENCIES etc (Additional Claims) 34 C4 441 [See: Gov 810 etseq, 910, 945.4; Shoemaker v Myers 2 CA4 1407; Stevenson v SFHA 24 CA4 269, T/AT 5/94]
|
|
