Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3726 In a defamation action, negligence is not enough to constitute malice, unless it amounts to a reckless disregard for the truth or wilful avoidance of accuracy, so a careless blunder that led a former employer to make defamatory statements about plaintiff to a prospective employer does not negate the common interest privilege.CitationNOEL v RIVER HILLS WILSONS (Careless Blunder) 113 CA4 1363 [See: CivC 47(c); Curtis v Butts 388 US 130; Sanborn v Chronicle 18 C3 406] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||