- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
p0622 REVIEW DENIED A choice-of-law clause appearing in a cruise contract that plaintiff did not receive until after paying for passage and might not have been enforceable under California law was enforceable under federal admiralty law.CitationSCHLESSINGER v HOLLAND AMERICA (Navigable Waters) 120 CA4 552 [See: Kermarec v Compagnie Generale 358 US 625] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||