Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0545 A plaintiff who alleged it had bid on at least one city project in the past and intended to bid on future projects had standing to challenge the Constitutionality of a city ordinance that would give preference to minority-owned businesses in awarding public works contracts.CitationCORAL CONSTRUCTION v CITY AND COUNTY OF SF (Standing) 116 CA4 6 [See: CA Const I, 31; Northeastern Fla v Jacksonville 508 US 656; Stocks v City of Irvine 114 CA3 520] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||