Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0496 REVIEW DENIED Attorneys who withdrew from the contingent fee representation of a client because they were offended by the client's request that they explain why the client's action was meritorious did not have sufficient justification for withdrawing to be entitled to quantum meruit fees from the client.CitationRUS, MILIBAND & SMITH v CONKLE & OLESTEN (Post-withdrawal Fee) 113 CA4 656 [See: Fracasse v Brent 6 C3 784; Est of Falco 188 CA3 1004; Jalali v Root 109 CA4 1768, T/AT 7/03] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||