Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3765 A landlord has no duty to protect third persons against a tenant's dog unless the landlord actually knows of the dog's presence and dangerous propensity; circumstantial evidence of such knowledge must demonstrate that the landlord must have known.CitationYUZON v COLLINS (Dog Attack) 116 CA4 149 [See: Uccello v Laudenslayer 44 CA3 504; Donchin v Guerrero 34 CA4 1832, T/AT 6/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||