|
p0583 REVIEW GRANTED An attorney who by inadvertence receives materials that obviously appear to be protected by the attorney-client or attorney work product privilege should refrain from examining them any more than necessary to determine that they are privileged; an attorney who fails to heed that rule is properly disqualified from further representation in the matter.CitationRICO v MITSUBISHI (Inadvertent Acquisition) 116 CA4 51 [See: Aerojet v Transport 18 CA4 996, T/AT 11/03; SCIF v WPS 70 CA4 644, T/AT 4/99]
|
|
