|
p0540 REVIEW DENIED An expert's opinion based on assumed facts, without any foundation for concluding those assumed facts exist, is inadmissible; an expert's conclusory opinion, without a reasoned explanation of how the facts led to the conclusion is inadmissible; an expert's opinion that there is a theoretical possibility a negligent act could have been a causeinfact of a particular injury is not sufficient to establish causation.CitationJENNINGS v PALOMAR POMERADO (Surgical Retractor) 114 Cal.App.4th 1108 [See: EvC 801; Summers v Gilbert 69 Cal.App.4th 1155, T/AT 3/99; Kelley v Trunk 66 Cal.App.4th 519, T/AT 10/98]
|
|
