|
3749 Although the law requires arbitration of disputes concerning the fees of independent Cumis counsel retained to defend an insured in the face of a potential conflict between insured and insurer, it does not require arbitration of costs incurred by Cumis counsel in connection with the defense.CitationGRAY CARY v VIGILANT INS (Cumis Costs) 114 CA4 1185 [See: CivC 2860; SD Federal CU v Cumis 162 CA3 358; Truck Ins v Superior Court 51 CA4 985, T/AT 2/97; Handy v First Interstate 13 CA4 917, T/AT 4/93]
|
|
