|
p0506 REVIEW GRANTED The signature of a partner for an unidentified partnership satisfies the signature requirement of the statute of frauds; parol evidence is admissible to clarify a street address given in a written contract that did not specify the city or state and to clarify a price term contained in the writing but stated in a confusing manner.CitationSTERLING v TAYLOR (Ambiguous Agreement) 113 CA4 931 [See: CivC 1624; Fritz v Mills 170 C 449; Gaggero v Yura 108 CA4 884, P/AT 7/03; Cal Canneries v Scatena 117 C 447; Alameda Belt Line v City of Alameda 113 CA4 15, P/AT 1/04]
|
|
