|
p0687 A declaration by a defendant's attorney that when a hearing date was requested for an anti-SLAPP motion, the court clerk said they were scheduling hearings more than 30 days off did not establish that docket conditions required scheduling the hearing more than 30 days after notice was served, as required by statute, so denial of the motion for failure to comply with time limits was justified.CitationFAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION v AMERICAN CIVIL RIGHTS COALITION (Late Hearing) 121 CA4 1171 [See: CCP 425.16; Decker v UD Registry 105 CA4 1382, P/AT 3/03
|
|
