Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0623 A trial court's ruling that California law should be applied to a class action was not a trial, so remand after reversal by the Court of Appeal did not call for a new trial, and a peremptory challenge following remand is not available.CitationSTATE FARM v SUPERIOR COURT (Peremptory Challenge) 121 CA4 490 [See: CCP 170.6; State Farm v Superior Court 114 CA4 434, P/AT 1/04; Hendershot v Superior Court 20 CA4 860, T/AT 2/94] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||