Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0600 REVIEW DENIED An amendment to the anti-SLAPP law prohibiting its application to actions arising from statements made to market a product or service must be applied to the appeal of an order entered before it went into effect.CitationPHYSICIANS COMMITTEE v TYSON (Amendment Pending Appeal) 119 CA4 120 [See: CCP 425.16, 425.17; Peo v Bradley 64 CA4 386; Peo v Acosta 48 CA4 411; Peo v $31,500 US Currency 32 CA4 1442; Chapman v Farr 132 CA3 1021 ] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||