3852 REVIEW DENIED A defendant who lured a prospective employee into leaving another job to accept employment with defendant by making promises it never intended to keep regarding compensation and the duration of employment may be liable in promissory fraud for damages unrelated to subsequent termination of the employee, regardless of whether the promises were enforceable as such.CitationAGOSTA v ASTOR (False Promise) 120 CA4 596 [See: Lazar v Superior Court 12 C4 631, T/AT 2/96; Starzynski v Capital 88 CA4 33, T/AT 5/01]
|
|