Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3754 REVIEW DENIED Tort liability for interference with prospective economic advantage cannot be imposed on a party to a contract for conduct that, in essence, amounts to a breach of that contract.CitationJRS v MATSUSHITA (Franchise Agreement) 115 CA4 168 [See: B&PC 20000 etseq; Khoury v Maly's 14 CA4 612, T/AT 5/93; Applied Equipment v Litton 7 C4 503, T/AT 5/94; Della Penna v Toyota 11 C4 376, T/AT 12/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||