Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3898 REVIEW DENIED In a defamation action, whether the fact that plaintiff was a pimp twenty years ago establishes the truth of a statement that plaintiff is a pimp is a question for the jury.CitationHUGHES v HUGHES (Pimptorial Arts) 122 CA4 931 [See: Rudin v Dow Jones 510 FS 210; Philadelphia Newspapers v Hepps 475 US 767; Masson v New Yorker Magazine 501 US 496; Emde v San Joaquin Central Labor 23 C2 146] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||