|
p0620 Findings of fact in support of a federal court's order are hearsay statements by the judge who made the order and not a proper subject for judicial notice; a federal court's order suppressing the use of a seized firearm as evidence in a federal prosecution based on a finding that the officer omitted material information from the affidavit submitted in support of the request for a warrant did not have the effect of issue preclusion (i.e., collateral estoppel) in a state action against the police officer and the state of California because neither the officer nor the state were parties to the federal prosecution.CitationKILROY v STATE (Judicial Notice) 119 CA4 140 [See: EvC 451; Lockley v Cantrell 91 CA4 875, T/AT 9/01; Sosinsky v Grant 6 CA4 1548; Clemmer v Hartford 22 C3 865]
|
|
