|
3817 REVIEW GRANTED In an action brought against a corporation and its CEO, after a judgment was entered against the corporation but in favor of the CEO, a settlement on appeal in which the corporation agreed to pay most of the damages that had been awarded against it and the plaintiff agreed to pay costs awarded to the CEO, and in which the CEO preserved his rights to sue the plaintiff's attorneys for malicious prosecution, did not prevent the action against the CEO from having been terminated on the merits and did not prevent the CEO from suing the attorneys for malicious prosecution.CitationSIEBEL v MITTLESTEADT (Settlement on Appeal) 118 CA4 406 [See: CCP 437c; Ferreira v Gray, Cary ... 87 CA4 409, T/AT 4/01; Sheldon Appel v Albert & Oliker 47 C3 863; Sangster v Paetkau 68 CA4 151, T/AT 1/99]
|
|
