Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3760 The testimony of a personnel expert that in his opinion certain acts of an employer were "indications" that it was motivated by retaliatory animus in terminating an employee should not have been admitted in a suit for retaliatory termination.CitationKOTLA v REGENTS OF UC (Expert's Indications) 115 CA4 283 [See: EvC 801; People v McAlpin 53 C3 1289] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||