|
p0611 The fact that a party's attorney is the husband of an attorney who formerly represented the party but was disqualified because she had previously represented the predecessor of the client's adversary does not justify disqualification in view of the attorney's declaration that no confidential information had been transmitted to him by his wife.CitationDERIVI v WONG (Married Lawyers) 118 CA4 1268 [See: CA R of PC 3310; Flatt v Superior Court 9 C4 275, T/AT 2/95; DCH v Waite 95 CA4 829, P/AT 3/02]
|
|
