- Home
 - Bios
 - Try Us Free
 - Subscribe
 - Case Library
 - CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
 - SLAPPS
 - Text Summaries
 - Search
 - Support
 
 
						Case Summary |  					
				|
 
						p0273 Neither the Federal Arbitration Act nor the federal Medicare law pre-empts California's disclosure requirements for an arbitration clause contained in a health care service agreement.CitationPAGARIGAN v SUPERIOR COURT (Medicare Pre-Emption) 102 CA4 1121 [See: H&SC 1363.1; 9 USC 1 etseq; 15 USC 1011; Erickson v Aetna 71 CA4 646, T/AT 5/99; Smith v PacifiCare 93 CA4 139, E/AT 1/02; Doctor's Assoc v Casarotto 517 US 68; Auto Equity v Superior Court 57 C2 450] |  
					|
| 
							 | 
							|||||
| 
							 | 
							|||||
							Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
							 | 
							|||||
							Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
							 | 
							|||||