|
p0232 Parties to a joint prosecution agreement expressing the understanding that communications between them and joint interviews of prospective witnesses would be confidential and protected by work-product privilege from disclosure to third parties entitled each of the parties to expect that reports obtained under it would remain confidential, so no party had the power to waive the other party's privilege regarding those reports.CitationARMENTA v SUPERIOR COURT (Joint Prosecution) 101 CA4 525 [See: CCP 2018; American Mut v Superior Court 38 CA3 579; Shadow Traffic v Superior Court 24 CA4 1067, T/AT 6/94]
|
|
