|
p0269 Unless there is a written opinion following the Court of Appeal's issuance of an alternative writ, the denial of a writ petition on the ground of mootness does not preclude consideration of jurisdiction issues in a subsequent appeal; when a motion is made to quash service on the ground that the court lacks personal jurisdiction, the burden is on plaintiff to show facts establishing sufficient minimum contacts with the state.CitationCARRETTI v ITALPAST (Pasta Machine) 101 CA4 1236 [See: Von's v Seabest 14 C4 434, T/AT 1/97; WorldWide VW v Woodson 444 US 286; Asahi v Superior Court 480 US 102; Solorzano v Superior Court 10 CA4 1135]
|
|
