|
3348 REVIEW DENIED A state law claim that would effectively require a manufacturer to include additional or different information on a label approved under the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act is pre-empted by the Act; a savings clause in federal statute referring to state products liability actions does not apply to a California claim in which plaintiff does not allege personal injury or property damage.CitationKANTER v WARNER-LAMBERT (Louse Pre-emption) 99 CA4 780 [See: 21 USC 301 etseq, 379r(a); Medtronic v Lohr 518 US 470]
|
|
