|
3284 REVIEW DENIED For statute of limitations purposes, a letter from an insurance carrier stating that no further benefits would be provided was an unequivocal denial, even though it did not use the word “deny” or “denial” and in spite of a statement of willingness to reconsider; the recent statutory amendment reviving certain insurance claims arising from the Northridge earthquake does not apply to damage resulting only from after shocks sustained by persons who were not covered at the time of the initial quake.CitationMIGLIORE v MID-CENTURY (Unequivocal Denial) 97 CA4 592 [See: Spray, Gould... v Associated 71 CA4 1260, T/AT 6/99 2343]
|
|
