|
P0143 In an eminent domain proceeding, an offer based on an appraisal that considered the property's non-conforming use rather than the use to which the property would be put when a new ordinance went into effect, and that turned out to be only 74% of the value demanded by the landowner and subsequently determined by a jury, was unreasonable, justifying the award of litigation expenses.CitationPEOPLE ex rel DOT v WOODSON (Condemnation Costs) 93 CA4 954 [See: CCP 1250.410; LA MTA v Continental 16 C4 694 T/AT 11/97]
|
|
