- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
3374 The fact that the acts of a Nevada attorney in attempting to collect a debt would violate the California Rules of Professional Conduct if committed by a California attorney is not sufficient to make those acts outrageous so as to subject the attorney to liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress.CitationROSS v CREEL PRINTING (Threatening Letter) 100 CA4 736 [See: Cervantez v JC Penney 24 C3 579; Bundren v Superior Court 145 CA3 784; Kinnamon v Staitman 66 CA3 893] |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||