|
p0229 REVIEW DENIED Evidence of unreasonable precondemnation conduct by a public entity that prevented the owner of realty from developing it to its highest and best use is not admissible to determine damages in a condemnation proceeding unless the court first finds the entity liable for the conduct, after which a jury may consider the effect that its conduct had on the value of the realty.CitationCITY OF RIPON v SWEETIN (Precondemnation Conduct) 100 CA4 887 [See: CCP 1250.410; Klopping v City of Whittier 8 C3 39]
|
|
