|
3270 In an action for common law fraud, the parol evidence rule precludes evidence that prior or contemporaneous inconsistent oral misrepresentations were made to induce a written contract, but such evidence may be admitted in an action under the unfair competition law or the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act.CitationWANG v MASSEY CHEVROLET (Tricky Lease) 97 CA4 856 [See: CivC 1770 etseq; B&PC 17200 etseq; CCP 1856; B of A v Pendergrass 4 C2 258; Reveles v Toyota 57 CA4 1139, T/AT 10/97 1722 ; Solorzano v Superior Court 10 CA4 1135; Alling v Universal 5 CA4 1412]
|
|
