Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3428 REVIEW GRANTED An employer is not iable under FEHA for sexual harassment of an employee by a customer or client of the employer.CitationSALAZAR v DIVERSIFIED PARATRANSIT (Non-employee Harassment) 103 CA4 131 [See: GovC 12900 etseq; 42 USC 2000e-2(a)(1); Oncale v Sundowner 523 US 75] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||