|
3233 REVIEW DENIED Oppressive tactics used by an employer to make employees sign an arbitration agreement made it so procedurally unconscionable that only a minimum of substantive unconscionability was required, and this requirement was satisfied by terms that required arbitration of all the claims an employee might bring while claims the employer was likely to bring could be submitted to the court, and that could require the employee to pay as much as $10,000 in arbitration costs.CitationMERCURO v SUPERIOR COURT (Unconscionable Agreement) 96 CA4 167 [See: Armendariz v Foundation Health 24 C4 83, T/AT 9/00]
|
|
