Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0248 REVIEW DENIED Disqualification of an attorney should not be based on a presumption that a non-lawyer client who may have had access to privileged information about another client communicated it to the attorney.CitationNEAL v HEALTH NET (Successive Clients) 100 CA4 831 [See: Flatt v SuperCt 9 C4 275, T/AT 2/95; Peo exrel Dept v SpeeDee 20 C4 1135; Hull v Celanese 513 F2 568] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||