|
P0178 An attorney's knowledge of confidential information about a former client is imputed to all members of the attorney's firm, but is not then imputed to attorneys representing the former client's adversary in a subsequent matter merely because a member of the original firm to which knowledge had been imputed appeared at a deposition on behalf of the second firm as an accommodation.CitationFRAZIER v SUPERIOR COURT (Double Imputation) 97 CA4 23 [See: CivC 2860; Flatt v SuperCt 9 C4 275, T/AT 2/95; Rosenfeld v Superior Court 235 CA3 566]
|
|
