|
P0152 REVIEW DENIED Expert testimony regarding dangers created by the configuration of a particular baseball field was properly excluded because the expert had no personal knowledge of the field in question; expert testimony regarding the effect of the sun on baseball players was properly excluded because the subject is a matter of common knowledge; expert testimony that a defendant's conduct was extremely negligent was properly excluded because it was a legal conclusion.CitationWEST v SUNDOWN LITTLE LEAGUE (Pop Fly) 96 CA4 351 [See: EvC 702, 801; Adams v City 68 CA4 243, T/AT 1/99; Summers v A.l. Gilbert 69 CA4 1155 T/AT 3/99]
|
|
