Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3327 REVIEW DENIED Federal Bankruptcy law does not pre-empt a state suit for malicious prosecution of an underlying fraud action that was based on state law and removed to Bankruptcy Court only because one of the defendants was acting in the capacity of a trustee in bankruptcy when the alleged fraud occurred.CitationSATTEN v WEBB (Bankruptcy Removal) 99 CA4 365 [See: Pauletto v Reliance 64 CA4 597, T/AT 7/98; Ross v Universal 95 CA4 537, T/AT 3/02; Saks v Parilla 67 CA4 566; T/AT 12/98] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||