|
P0224 REVIEW DENIED It may be error for a trial court to grant a motion to declare a person a vexatious litigant without conducting an oral hearing, but the person so declared has the burden of establishing that the error was prejudicial by showing that oral hearing would have led to a different result; a motion to declare a person a vexatious litigant may be made when no litigation is pending before the court.CitationBRAVO v ISMAJ (Vexatious Litigant) 99 CA4 211 [See: CCP 391.7; Kelly v New West 49 CA4 659, T/AT 11/96]
|
|
