Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3399 The court refused to adopt the doctrine of inevitable disclosure of trade secrets, so a plaintiff seeking to enjoin a former employee from working for a competitor on the ground of trade secret violation, must prove that the former employee actually disclosed or will disclose plaintiff's trade secrets.CitationSCHLAGE v WHYTE (Inevitable Disclosure) 101 CA4 1493 [See: PepsiCo v Redmond 54 F3 1262; Globespan v O'Neill 151 FS2 1229; Bayer v Roche 72 FS2 1111] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||