|
3329 REVIEW DENIED An employer that terminated an employee with access to sensitive information about police officers and who was about to marry an incarcerated felon did not thereby violate the employee’s right to privacy under the California Constitution, because its policy was rationally related to a legitimate interest in preventing the improper disclosure to criminals of confidential information that could jeopardize the personal safety of the officers.CitationORTIZ v LA POLICE RELIEF ASSN (Prisoner’s Marriage) 98 CA4 1288 [See: CA Const Art I, sec 1; Tylo v Superior Court 55 CA4 1379, T/AT 8/97; Hill v NCAA 7 C4 1]
|
|
