Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3277 In permitting a cellular phone company to use its easement over plaintiffs property for ingress and egress to land it had rented the cellular phone company, a water company committed a trespass rather than a taking for a public use, so plaintiff was not entitled to attorney fees upon succeeding in its action against the water company.CitationPATEL v SO CAL WATER CO (Easement Trespass) 97 CA4 841 [See: CCP 1036; City of SB v Cloer 216 CA2 127] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||