Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3396 In deciding whether there was a substantial risk connected with a medical procedure, a jury is required to rely solely on expert testimony, but once it determines that there was a substantial risk, its determination regarding failure to obtain the patient's informed consent should be made regardless of expert testimony.CitationBETTERTON v LEICHTLING (Duty to Inform) 101 CA4 749 [See: Cobbs v Grant 8 C3 229; Arato v Avedon 5 C4 1172, T/AT 11/93; Daum v SpineCare 52 CA4 1285, T/AT 4/97 ] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||