|
3228 REVIEW DENIED In an action for intentional interference with economic advantage in which plaintiff’s only claims of independent wrongfulness were unethical business conduct and misappropriation of trade secrets, the trial court was correct in instructing the jury that plaintiff had the burden of showing that defendant misappropriated trade secrets.CitationGEMINI v CA CUSTOM SHAPES (Misappropriation) 95 CA4 1249 [See: CivC 3426.4; CrossTalk v Jacobson 65 CA4 631, T/AT 9/98; Westside v Safeway 42 CA4 507, T/AT 3/96; Bed, Bath & Beyond v. LaJolla Village Square 52 CA4 867, T/AT 3/97; Della Penna v Toyota 11 C4 376, T/AT 12/95]
|
|
