|
3263 REVIEW DENIED A judgment in a prior action declaring that the insurers had no obligation to defend or indemnify for liability that the insured incurred or may incur arising out of the alleged release of waste materials between the 1950's and 1980's at or from property occupied at one time or another by the insured in Eastern Sacramento County bars a subsequent action by the insured for a declaration that it is entitled to coverage for new claims brought against it by other landowners who allege that from the 1950's to the 1980's, harmful chemicals were discharged into the groundwater at a site owned by the insured in Eastern Sacramento County.CitationAEROJET v AMERICAN EXCESS INS (Broad Judgment) 96 CA4 665 [See: Aerojet v Transport 17 C4 38, T/AT 2/98; Kupfer v Brawner 19 C2 562]
|
|
