|
P0133 A non-resident's use of a California based internet service provider to publish information on the internet that was no more likely to be seen by internet users in California than by users anywhere else in the world was not sufficient to confer on California courts in personam jurisdiction over the non-resident.CitationNAM TAI ELECTRONICS v TITZER (Internet Defamation) 93 CA4 1301 [See: Jewish Defense Org v Superior Court 72 CA4 1045, T/AT 7/99; Pavlovich v Superior Court 91 CA4 409, E/AT 9/01]
|
|
