|
3337 Under personal injury coverage in a CGL policy, the insurer did not have a duty to defend a class action in which plaintiff’s complaint contained the statement that no member of the class was seeking damages for personal injury; the remote possibility that plaintiff could amend to make it an individual action seeking damages for personal injury did not create such a dutyCitationLOW v GOLDEN EAGLE (PI Waiver) 99 CA4 109 [See: Gunderson v Fire Ins Exch 37 CA4 1106, T/AT 9/95; Hurley v State Farm 10 CA4 533, T/AT 12/92]
|
|
