Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P0119 REVIEW DENIED In a class action brought on behalf of 116,000 class members only 14, 000 of whom were entitled to share in the award, the plaintiff class was the prevailing party for the purpose of awarding attorney fees, which, based on the lodestar method and on the trial court's sound discretion, were found to be vaild.CitationACREE v GMAC (Miscalculated Refund) 92 CA4 385 [See: CivC 1717; Sears v Baccaglio 60 CA4 1136; Hsu v Abbara 9 C4 863] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||