Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P0083 REVIEW DENIED Although a public entity and a contractor it hired exchanged correspondence between themselves and their attorneys while negotiating contract details, they did not thereby waive the attorney / client privilege to permit discovery of the correspondence by members of the public under the Public Records Act.CitationSTI v SUPERIOR COURT (Exchanged Memos) 91 CA4 334 [See: GovC 6250 etseq; EvC 912; Raytheon v Superior Court 208 CA3 683] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||