p0039 REVIEW DENIED An arbitration agreement that franchisees were required to sign under threat of losing their franchises and that required arbitration in Utah of all disputes, prohibited consolidation of arbitrations, and prohibited the award of punitive damages was unenforceable as an unconscionable adhesion contract.CitationBOLTER v SUPERIOR COURT (Franchise Arbitration) 87 CA4 534 [See: CCP 1281; Armendariz v Foundation Health 24 C4 83, T/AT 9/00; 24 Hour Fitness v Superior Court 66 CA4 1199, T/AT 11/98; Lagatree v Luce, Forward... 74 CA4 1105, T/AT 10/99]
|
|