Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0024 In an action for retaliatory termination, statements by employees who had no role in the decision to terminate plaintiff were not admissible as admissions by the employer.CitationMORGAN v REGENTS (Grievance Retaliation) 88 CA4 52 [See: EvC 1200, 1220, 1222; O'Mary v Mitsubishi 59 CA4 563, T/AT 1/98; EEOC v Watergate 24 F3 635] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||